Asterisk 1.2.3, FreePBX 2.4.1 and ViciDial 2.0.4 on CentOS 5

All installation and configuration problems and questions

Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N

Asterisk 1.2.3, FreePBX 2.4.1 and ViciDial 2.0.4 on CentOS 5

Postby Mika1974 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:45 am

Today I am working on a guide to help people like myself - and call centers I work with - install Asterisk + FreePBX + ViciDial on CentOS 5.2.

There is already some documentation on this but thats all based on older versions. My obvious sources are (sorry new users can't post URLs properly):

Eflo Scratch Install (the PDF version)
Vicidial Wiki (Vici+FreePBX & Vici Easy Install)

I've chosen to use Asterisk 1.2.30 as this is recommended for performance with ViciDial (referenced somewhere in the Scratch Install).

Is it still the case that Asterisk 1.4 + Vici are NOT recommended?

Does anyone have any suggestions for or experiences with this kind of install?

Does anyone have any performance suggestions? Does it help performance compiling MySQL / Apache from source?

This setup (with FreePBX) is generally only suitable for smaller call centers (based on what I read) but it saves us a lot of time and money as I can do things myself.

Thanks in advance!
Mika1974
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:47 pm

Postby Mika1974 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:50 am

Any reason NOT to install FreePBX? There will be a max of 20 agents dialing through these servers.
Mika1974
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:47 pm

Postby Mika1974 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:07 pm

Found very good guides on for setting up production environments on www.powerpbx.org. This is excluding Vici, there is a cryptic (for newbies) guide on ViciDialWiki. Looking to expand on that.

Mika1974 wrote:Is it still the case that Asterisk 1.4 + Vici are NOT recommended?


I now have the answer: "1.2 is still performing the best, but we are thinking about declaring the latest 1.4 releases as usable..."
Mika1974
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:47 pm

Postby mflorell » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:27 pm

Asterisk 1.4 is fairly stable at this point, but it has not been in used long enough for us to say it is better than 1.2.

There are many reasons not to use FreePBX, including cutting the functional capacity of your VICIDIAL server in half and increased difficulty in debugging problems.
mflorell
Site Admin
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Florida

Postby Mika1974 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 4:38 pm

Thank you for your answers.

Please bare with me as I am fluent with using FreePBX - but not with editing Asterisk configuration files.

What functionality am I cutting in ViciDial exactly? (I am reading a Asterisk book and purchased the ViciDial manuals so I'll be more fluent in a week orso)
Mika1974
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:47 pm

Postby mflorell » Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:42 pm

You would not be cutting functionality, you cut capacity.

For example, we took two identical systems, on one we installed Slackware, asterisk, VICIDIAL and a basic dialplan. The other system we installec CentOS, Asterisk and FreePBX and VICIDIAL.

When we ran both systems in performance testing mode, we could reliably dial out more than twice as many outbound calls on the non-FreePBX box as we could reliably on the FreePBX-enabled box.
mflorell
Site Admin
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Florida

Postby Mika1974 » Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:15 pm

Good to hear some proper performance advice. So your also saying ditch the CentOS and go for Slackware. Alright we can do that.

Is there a document where there is more on performance? (Besides the machine specs already elsewhere on this site)
Mika1974
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:47 pm

Postby mflorell » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:47 am

There is a document on performance testing in the docs of releases, but optimizing performance of a VICIDIAL system is very dependant on what kind of call handling you are doing, what kind of server you have, what kind of telco lines you are using, if you are doing recording etc...

There are really a lot of factors in performance tuning and we have not written a document to cover all of that yet.
mflorell
Site Admin
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Florida


Return to Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests