Page 1 of 1

Did the nonpause time definition change?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:42 am
by dspaan
I just made an agent performance detail report of yesterday:

Image


And this is the team performance detail report of the same day:

Image

How can the nonpause time have a differnt definition in two reports? It should be one definition through the whole system. What is the difference between the two time columns in the team performance report?

Re: Did the nonpause time definition change?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:43 pm
by williamconley
Because those two reports are looking at different values that may look at time spent with clients vs time logged in to a campaign. Did you read the "notes" at the top of each report to see what they measure?

Re: Did the nonpause time definition change?

PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2015 12:19 pm
by dspaan
The description of the agent performance detail report says only this: Statistics related to handling of calls only

My questions are still valid:
-How can the nonpause time have a differnt definition in two reports? It should be one definition through the whole system. What is the difference between the two time columns in the team performance report?
-The nonpause time in the agent performance report is too low, it's simply incorrect.
-How can the login time be less then the TIME value
-Why are the nonpause time and the system almost the same, what's the difference in the team performance report. Maybe hover-over info balloon on the report headers would help

Re: Did the nonpause time definition change?

PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2015 4:22 pm
by chasejordan1
I noticed that 2 when I upgraded, now I have to do the math myself. I pay my people based on non-pause time, that way the agent needs to try and be quick and efficient with dispositioning calls and so forth, but I find agents will still and try to work in the minutes etc.

Re: Did the nonpause time definition change?

PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2015 9:48 am
by dspaan
Yes, we used that time too for paying agents. I can't imagine this change was intentional. Hope Matt reads this.