ConfBridge vs Meetme

Discussions about new features or changes in existing features

Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N

ConfBridge vs Meetme

Postby mav2287 » Wed Jun 04, 2014 3:54 pm

As I have been becoming more and more familiar with asterisk I have been seeing a lot migration toward ConfBridge over MeetMe. Is this something that can be done with VICIdial? If so is there any advantage? just curious...
ViciBox5.x86_64-5.0.3.preload from .iso upgraded to 13.1 | VERSION: 2.10-444c BUILD: 150129-0828 | 1.8.32.2-vici | Dual Server | No Digium/Sangoma Hardware | No Extra Software After Installation | Intel twin quad core 3Ghz Xeon chips | 32gb of RAM
mav2287
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: ConfBridge vs Meetme

Postby mflorell » Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:19 am

We've been over this topic several times, meetme allows for a hardware timer which guarantees solid timing and good audio synchronization and recording even under high loads, that's the reason we use it and will probably continue to use it as long as it's the only conferencing engine that does that. We've tried using other conferencing engines in the past and that always ends up being a problem with them.
mflorell
Site Admin
 
Posts: 18384
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Florida


Return to Features

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

cron