Hi williamconley. Thanks for your quick reply! I sure was not expecting it so soon. Thanks for the welcome.
Asterisk is not new to me. I'm actually running part of the callcenter in 5 asterisk boxes mostly for the administrative part (one box), but I also have a test box, the operational 'productive' box, and the switch that connects them all. I'm pretty familiar with Mr.*, but I was looking for a predictive dialer, and that's how I got here. I had not realized that there was another 'pop-in-the-cd-for-complete-install" iso out there. I thought GoAutoDial was 'it' and I did try to compile it myself, but I got nothing but errors and just got tired of all the 'extra hassle'. You really have to be brave to compile yourself....
I am now downloading the Vicibox to check it out. Something I'm not really fond of is that it uses OpenSuse ans the Linux Distro of choice, but it has been a while since the last time I used OpenSuse for anything -other than cursing at it for it's uselessness (in my opinion)-, but again, I think it is better than any EPEL (RedHat derivative) I've used, so.... I really like that it is 'ready to cluster' which was my next step after getting the hang out of Vici. So...., its starting to grow in my this Vicibox....
In any case, I don't like the fact that the extensions used as 'service extensions' (meetme, voicemail, etc) are actually extensions that could be in the same batch. For example, in my current environment we use 3xxx extensions for production, 2xxx for admin (like real admin people, eg. Human resources) and 8xxx for some 'special' production stations. In the Vicidial, the schema seems to be 8001 -> 81xx (I'm making these up) as agent stations and then from 82xx -> 83xx as "meetme's". What if I have 83xx extensions (meaning that I have over 200 extensions filling up). They could've used 8y0xx -> 8y1xx or something that is not a 'possible' extension. In my specific scenario I use ****8001 (for example) as a meetme extension -with the asterisks in front-. What the developers have done is limit me to a certain ammount of extensions before I have to make a huge mess to 'fix' the limitation that I inherited. See what I mean? In my enterprise where I have a bit over 1000 stations I need a whole 8000 -> 8999 'block' of extensions and therefore the need to change the whole dial plan.
Going back to my original question....., I was just wondering if someone had a 'hardcopy' of the schema the developers had to assign the numbers so I could save me a few hours (or days, don;t know how tangled up this is) to figure out the schema being used and change it.
Anyway williamconley, thanks for your help. I really appreciate it! I think that I'll have to get dirty into the dialplan 'cause I have to fix it anyway..., jeje. Wish me luck
Oh, and thanks for the Vicibox info! I'm actually pretty excited on that one!