64 bit install iso, possible fix and kernel version question
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:39 pm
Hi there, log time lurker, first time poster.
I've been stressing over being unable to install the newest (3.1.8, downloaded yesterday) ISO image and just now came across an interesting issue. The server would freeze immediately after grub went to the kernel, inidcating the drive could not be found, and asking if I'd like to fall back to my main drive (/dev/sda2). Much searching later allowed me to identify this as a kernel issue, where the megaraid_sas drivers were missing.
There are two kernels installed on the iso: 2.6.34-12 and 2.6.34.7.0.7. By default the system attempts to load -12, which is missing the megaraid_sas drivers (and other stuff like USB drivers). The .7 kernel has everything and boots normally.
To fix my no-boot i simply added a line to grub for the .7 kernel, and voila!
But, which kernel is the intended one for Vicidial? Should i attempt to fix the -12 kernel, or am i safe to stick with .7?
Thanks,
-Matt
I've been stressing over being unable to install the newest (3.1.8, downloaded yesterday) ISO image and just now came across an interesting issue. The server would freeze immediately after grub went to the kernel, inidcating the drive could not be found, and asking if I'd like to fall back to my main drive (/dev/sda2). Much searching later allowed me to identify this as a kernel issue, where the megaraid_sas drivers were missing.
There are two kernels installed on the iso: 2.6.34-12 and 2.6.34.7.0.7. By default the system attempts to load -12, which is missing the megaraid_sas drivers (and other stuff like USB drivers). The .7 kernel has everything and boots normally.
To fix my no-boot i simply added a line to grub for the .7 kernel, and voila!
But, which kernel is the intended one for Vicidial? Should i attempt to fix the -12 kernel, or am i safe to stick with .7?
Thanks,
-Matt