Page 1 of 1

Instead of zttest on VICIbox ----- SOLVED

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:17 pm
by omar
Hi.

I just installed VICIbox i686-3.1.12 32 bits for testing porpuses. Then, luckly my x100p card has been installed correctly too.

Code: Select all
VICIDIAL01*CLI> dahdi show status
Description                              Alarms     IRQ        bpviol     CRC4
Wildcard X100P Board 1                   RED        0          0          0



Now, I want to see the performance of the card with the zttest command, but it doesn't exist in my new VICIbox installation.

So, could you help me please to find the command or install it on VICIbox.

Thanks

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:00 pm
by mflorell
Zaptel is no longer used, so zttest won't do anything, you now use dahdi_test to do the timing test.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:10 am
by omar
mflorell wrote:Zaptel is no longer used, so zttest won't do anything, you now use dahdi_test to do the timing test.


Thanks a lot Matt.
The output of dahdi_test for a X100P card is:

Code: Select all
VICIDIAL01:~ # dahdi_test
Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy...
99.993% 99.988% 99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.993%
99.992% 99.991% 99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.993% 99.991% 99.992%
99.992% 99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.994% 99.991%
99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.993% 99.993%
99.991% 99.993% 99.992% 99.992% 99.992% 99.993% 99.993% 99.992%
99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.992% 99.994% 99.990% 99.993% 99.992%
99.993% 99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.993% 99.993% 99.992% 99.993%
99.992% 99.993% 99.992% 99.997% 99.997% 99.997% 99.996% 99.999%
99.993% 99.995% 99.997% 99.996% 99.996% 99.996% 99.997% 99.997% ^C
--- Results after 72 passes ---
Best: 99.999 -- Worst: 99.988 -- Average: 99.993020, Difference: 99.993019


later on the same machine I will test a sangoma usb timer

Thanks again

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:16 pm
by williamconley
excellent idea. post those results, too, along with the "no timer at all" results ...

what would be really cool is if you could load test it in each situation and see when the call quality breaks up with each scenario ... 8-)