Page 1 of 1
Vicibox Redux 3.0.5 only see 3.3 GB
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:32 am
by phil_discount
Hi guys,
i've got many installation with redux 3.0.5 and all servers have more than 4 GB of RAM and it works.
my BIOS and yast2 see the whole 8 GB of RAM .. but cat /proc/meminfo see only 3.3 GB ..
Where can be the problem?
Hardware:
CPU AMD FX-4100 Quardcore
RAM 2x4GB DDR3 Kingston 1333 MHz
Mainboard: ASUS M5A78L-M-USB3.0
regards
philip
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:41 am
by williamconley
cat /proc/meminfo see only 3.3 GB
when i use cat /proc/meminfo, i get a lot more than "how much is seen". What do you have for "MemTotal:"?
Did you load the 64 bit version or the 32 bit version?
If 32 bit: Are you running the PAE Kernel?
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:44 pm
by phil_discount
it shows me 3316676 kB
i'm using 32 bit with PAE ..
i use this version on all installations .. so it must be the hardware?
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:18 pm
by williamconley
post results from
- Code: Select all
uname -r
cat /proc/meminfo
Remember that 32 bit inherently can only access 3.2G of RAM, so the PAE kernel should be there to get it past that. However: I do not have any systems running 32 bit with more than 2G of RAM.
Why did you not use 64 bit?
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:35 pm
by phil_discount
redux 64 bit db only shows me 3.3 GB too
uname -a (database only version)
linux 2.6.34.7-0-2-default #1 SMP 2010-09-14 ... x86_64 GNU/Linux
if i install windows 7 64 bit i get full access too the 8 GB ..
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:48 pm
by williamconley
redux 64 bit db
? I think you should post the entire filename of the iso you are talking about. Perhaps you have not actually installed it?
linux 2.6.34.7-0-2-default
not a pae kernel
XXXX:~ # uname -a
Linux pt38 2.6.27.45-0.1-pae #1 SMP 2010-02-22 16:49:47 +0100 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
note the "pae" ... (I found a client box running 32 bit! with pae!)
cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 4062284 kB
MemFree: 2978840 kB
Buffers: 66568 kB
Cached: 641632 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 855068 kB
Inactive: 167064 kB
HighTotal: 3196544 kB
HighFree: 2231328 kB
LowTotal: 865740 kB
LowFree: 747512 kB
SwapTotal: 2104472 kB
SwapFree: 2104472 kB
Dirty: 4368 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 313952 kB
Mapped: 21256 kB
Slab: 41904 kB
SReclaimable: 31772 kB
SUnreclaim: 10132 kB
PageTables: 2660 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
WritebackTmp: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 4135612 kB
Committed_AS: 804124 kB
VmallocTotal: 110584 kB
VmallocUsed: 13124 kB
VmallocChunk: 97176 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
HugePages_Rsvd: 0
HugePages_Surp: 0
Hugepagesize: 2048 kB
DirectMap4k: 8192 kB
DirectMap2M: 909312 kB
and 4 G ram
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:45 pm
by phil_discount
ok again:
first i installed vicibox 3.0.5 32bit with PAE kernel
-> 3.3 GB
Linux vicidial 2.6.34.7-0.2-pae #1 SMP 2010-09-14 14:21:06 +0200 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
second i installed vicibox 3.0.5 64bit database only for a test
-> 3.3 GB
Linux vicidial 2.6.34.7-0.2-default #1 SMP 2010-09-14 14:21:06 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
third i installed windows 7 64 bit
-> 8 GB
seems to be a problem with amd processors/mainboards?? becuase every installation i've done with redux 3.0.5 i've got no problems .. but every server works with intel processors
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:28 pm
by williamconley
hm. Dual-Core AMD Opteron
- Code: Select all
#uname -a
Linux pt102 2.6.34.10-0.4-default #1 SMP 2011-10-19 22:16:41 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Code: Select all
# dmidecode | grep Product
Product Name: PowerEdge SC1435
Product Name: 0YK962
- Code: Select all
# cat /var/log/boot.msg | grep CPU0
<6>[ 0.189797] CPU0: Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212 stepping 03
- Code: Select all
# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 4121184 kB
but this is ViciBox Redux v.3.1.12
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:05 pm
by phil_discount
there is something missing for amd .. any idea where i can look and try something?
Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:01 pm
by williamconley
try booting from a few different OS distros and see which one makes the system happier. if any.
also try 3.1.14.
Posted:
Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:41 pm
by phil_discount
in 3.1.4. is the problem solved ..