Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N
williamconley wrote:Silly question: Why Scratch on CentOS instead of GoAutoDial?
mikes wrote:williamconley wrote:Silly question: Why Scratch on CentOS instead of GoAutoDial?
is Goautodial install comes on centos OS ?
This indicates that the system is NOT in need of Balance dialing. In other words: If short/fill are 0/0 the dialers without agents on them have no reason to dial. If there are no dialers which are "short" of trunks, the other dialers have no reason to "fill" that shortage by dialing for them. Reducing the available channels on the server with the agents (Admin->Server->Max Trunks) will cause that server to be "short" and request other dialers to "fill" for it.Short/Fill = 0/0
Properly configured with load balanced agents, Vicidial will handle the "agent X on dialer Y" portion for you. It requires special setup of the phones when you begin. You'll use "phone aliases" (Admin->Phones->top menu area for aliases) and create phones on 1-4 dialers for each agent. When they log in with the alias instead of a phone, the system will call them from the phone on the server with the least agents. Each agent phone must be capable of registering to multiple dialers. It is not necessary to have all agents registered on all dialers for this to be effective. Having them registered to two per agent will still help to balance.the idea of separating the agents on different dialers is not a option. the company is offshore it's not going to be possible to seperate every 8 agents on a dialer as lots of things change and the management of it going to be a pain in the ass. this is a upgrade to vicidial from freeswitch and if we need to do that then it's more of a downgrade.
williamconley wrote:Also worthy of note: In the over 1000 simultaneous channel range, you'll need lots of calls per second to keep the dialers up to speed. Your carrier may frown on this, so you should check to find what your Max Calls Per Second is before jumping. I've had systems in need of 200 CPS per dialer to be able to maintain 1500 lines with high-volume dialing. Many carriers will limit you to 5CPS or 30CPS depending on their internal restrictions unless/until you discuss it with them.
Not only that, but there are instructions for goautodial being installed AFTER the OS (ie: Install stock CentOS and then use the goautodial system to get everything up and running). This is available (if I recall) on the goautodial Wiki.
mikes wrote:Ok that is a good option to split the agent if it does not require for the agent to change the IP on his eyebeam. i will look into that.
also for the short/fill i had edited the value it is at 352/352 i had typed 0/0 by mistake
gardo wrote:Yep. Here's the HOWTO: http://goautodial.org/projects/goautodialce/wiki/64bit. GOautodial CE is based from CentOS since the very beginning (circa 2006 as VicidialNOW).Not only that, but there are instructions for goautodial being installed AFTER the OS (ie: Install stock CentOS and then use the goautodial system to get everything up and running). This is available (if I recall) on the goautodial Wiki.
mikes wrote:williamconley wrote:Also worthy of note: In the over 1000 simultaneous channel range, you'll need lots of calls per second to keep the dialers up to speed. Your carrier may frown on this, so you should check to find what your Max Calls Per Second is before jumping. I've had systems in need of 200 CPS per dialer to be able to maintain 1500 lines with high-volume dialing. Many carriers will limit you to 5CPS or 30CPS depending on their internal restrictions unless/until you discuss it with them.
The carriers i am using have me set for 100 cps but i can increase with no problem if i need to. now let me ask you if i have 4 dialers at 20cps for each... does that mean it's 80cps? or 20 in total?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 72 guests