Hey Guys,
Quick question. Is VICIDIAL with Asterisk 11 stable enough yet? How is the overhead now? I know it was higher in the past. How has the server density been affected?
Thanks in advance!
Asterisk 11
Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Asterisk 11
by Acidshock » Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:42 am
VERSION: 2.14-698a | BUILD: 190207-2301 | Asterisk:13.24.1-vici | Vicibox 8.1.2
- Acidshock
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Re: Asterisk 11
by mflorell » Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:31 pm
Asterisk 11 seems to be just as stable as Asterisk 1.8 with Vicidial. Although, there are more default modules loaded, so we have been testing with an ever-growing list of "noload" modules in modules.conf.
We've had Asterisk 11 servers in production now for over 7 months and they are doing very well.
As for capacity, it doesn't seem much different from 1.8.
We've had Asterisk 11 servers in production now for over 7 months and they are doing very well.
As for capacity, it doesn't seem much different from 1.8.
- mflorell
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
Re: Asterisk 11
by Acidshock » Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:12 pm
Awesome thank you!
VERSION: 2.14-698a | BUILD: 190207-2301 | Asterisk:13.24.1-vici | Vicibox 8.1.2
- Acidshock
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests