Warnings displayed when using meetme DTMF passthru patch

All installation and configuration problems and questions

Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N

Warnings displayed when using meetme DTMF passthru patch

Postby janus » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:49 am

astguiclient version: 2.0.3
asterisk version: 1.2.24
OS: CentOS

I installed the meetme dtmf passthru patch on 2.0.3 version of astguiclient.
Just want to ask why there are warnings displayed on asterisk cli when sending dtmf on meetme.

-- Executing MeetMe("IAX2/dialer-2", "8600002|qF") in new stack
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/meetme.conf': Found
== Spawn extension (default, 8600002, 0) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/dialer-5'
-- Executing MeetMe("IAX2/dialer-5", "8600002|qF") in new stack
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/meetme.conf': Found
-- Created MeetMe conference 1021 for conference '8600002'
== Manager 'sendcron' logged off from 127.0.0.1
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found
== Manager 'sendcron' logged on from 127.0.0.1
== Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found
== Manager 'sendcron' logged on from 127.0.0.1
== Manager 'sendcron' logged off from 127.0.0.1
Jan 16 16:34:02 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
== Manager 'sendcron' logged off from 127.0.0.1
Jan 16 16:34:12 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:12 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:13 WARNING[7171]: channel.c :2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:13 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:15 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
-- Registered SIP '2099' at 124.106.69.200 port 60009 expires 120
Jan 16 16:34:37 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:44 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
-- Registered SIP '2099' at 124.106.69.15 port 64205 expires 120
Jan 16 16:34:50 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:51 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:52 WARNING[7171]: channel.c :2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:52 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
Jan 16 16:34:53 WARNING[7171]: channel.c:2290 ast_write: Thread 1082792288 Blocking 'IAX2/dialer-2', already blocked by thread 1080662368 in procedure ast_waitfor_nandfds
janus
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:45 am

Postby mcargile » Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:33 pm

This is currently begin discussed on the asterisk-dev mailing list. It has to do with concurrence issues.
Michael Cargile | Director of Engineering | ViciDialGroup | http://www.vicidial.com

The official source for VICIDIAL services and support. 1-888-894-VICI (8424)
mcargile
Site Admin
 
Posts: 617
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:38 am

Postby mflorell » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:21 pm

I have a few clients with the patch installed and these warnings come up on their systems. They don't seem to be causing any serious problems in audio quality or stability.
mflorell
Site Admin
 
Posts: 18387
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Florida

Postby janus » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:40 am

So far we don't have any complains yet from our clients in terms of audio quality and it doesn't also causes the asterisk to hangup or crashes. Thanks Matt.
janus
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:45 am


Return to Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 55 guests