Any and all non-support discussions
Moderators: gerski, enjay, williamconley, Op3r, Staydog, gardo, mflorell, MJCoate, mcargile, Kumba, Michael_N
by marvin » Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:01 am
Does anybody here tried using vicidial on a dual processor environment?
How does it affect the whole server performance?
Did the number of seats increased compared to single proc?
-
marvin
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:35 am
- Location: Cebu, Philippines
-
by Op3r » Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:18 am
90% of echosystem (philippine based asterisk guys) install of vicidial are on dual xeon boxes.
The increase of performance? it really boils down to the proper configuration.
Get paid for US outbound Toll Free calls. PM me.
-
Op3r
-
- Posts: 1432
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 7:53 pm
- Location: Manila
-
by mflorell » Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:44 am
The number of seats will increase, but not proportionally to having double processing power.
Performance also depends greatly on what kind of setting you have and what kind of VOIP codecs you are using if any.
-
mflorell
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
-
by vctor » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:11 pm
Yes we already have installed vicidial on a dual processor, unfortunately we did not get the performance boost that we were expecting on a dual proc system.
-
vctor
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:32 pm
-
by marvin » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:42 pm
ic ... thanks guys!
whats the reason behind this? anybody knows the reason or perhaps a theory behind this? ... just like vctor, i was expecting that if you use those dual proc your performance will be more or less equal to those dual server ... i really dont know much in hardware
-
marvin
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:35 am
- Location: Cebu, Philippines
-
by mflorell » Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:53 pm
two reasons:
- motherboard BUS speed and the limitations of the path from the CPU to the memory
- The load spikes from Asterisk seem to grow exponentially not proportionally when they happen.
-
mflorell
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
-
by gschaller » Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:30 pm
The path from CPU to memory is bad on Intel processors. AMD processors are directly connected to memory, so they are faster. Intel dual-core processors have to share the slow path to memory. I have a Asterisk on a AMD 4400+ (dual-core 2,2 GHz with 1 MB cache/core). On my two server setup (Asterisk + Apache/MySQL) the Asterisk server has a loadavg of maximum 0.7 with 10 Agents, full recording and dial-level 2.0. I think I can have minimum 20 agents on this setup. At the beginning I had a dual-core Xeon (Dell Poweredge SC1420 with 3 GHz I think, don't buy this one, isn't compatible because the chipset has a timing problem). This server had a loadavg of 1.6 to 1.8. Anyone with a newer Intel processor?
-
gschaller
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:59 pm
by mflorell » Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:10 pm
I just ordered an Intel "Core 2 Duo" processor which is supposed to address a lot of the data path and bottleneck issues of the first generation of Intel Dual core processors. Won't be in for two weeks. I will post my results when I get it all running.
-
mflorell
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
-
by gerski » Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:36 pm
Intel "Core 2 Duo" processor runs perfectly on asterisk, im now running 14 agents with no codec transcoding. and the loads is less than 1.0
with 2gig Memory
Sata Hardisk
Realtek Lancard
Digium X100P
-
gerski
-
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:21 am
-
by marvin » Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:16 pm
i have here AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ running with max of 15 agents before funny things happens
no recording though.
just recieved the xeon 3.4 that i ordered couple of weeks ago ... ill try to hit on this sometime this week ... am expecting that this would reach at least 20 seats just like the FAQ says.
-
marvin
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 1:35 am
- Location: Cebu, Philippines
-
by kchung » Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:59 pm
Here's an idea: create a benchmarking script which simulates X amount of meetme conferences and Y amounts of loopback dialing to simulate predictive dialing and Z amounts of database queries done by the vicicdial client.
-
kchung
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:28 pm
by mflorell » Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:30 pm
That's my plan. After 2.0.1 is released of course.
-
mflorell
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
-
by kchung » Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:35 pm
Awesome!
and of course create a website where we can submit data as a community. Perhaps the script can automate the submission, along with hardware and software profile and a checksum to make sure no one is BS'ing?
-
kchung
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 5:28 pm
by mflorell » Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:54 am
That's a bit more than I was planning to do. Benchmarking will differ a lot depending on the setup that different people use. Some have only Zap channels, some have on only SIP channels. Some people record all calls and some record none. It's very hard to simulate every kind of setup. I was just planning to test a few different setups all with the same hardware to show what the capacity and/or load for that kind of setup would be like.
-
mflorell
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 18387
- Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Florida
-
Return to General Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests